<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type='text/xsl' href='/uploadedfiles/transforms/rsspretty.xsl'?><rss xmlns:a10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Topic: Food Additives</title><link>http://www.pewhealth.org/</link><description>Pew&amp;#39;s work on food additives seeks to assess and resolve hidden risks around the thousands of chemicals added to our food or its packaging with limited or no safety oversight.</description><item><guid isPermaLink="false">85899474417</guid><link>http://www.pewhealth.org/news-room/media-coverage/fda-to-consider-revamping-food-additive-rules-85899474417</link><title>''FDA to Consider Revamping Food Additive Rules''</title><description>&lt;p&gt;"Amid growing public concern over the safety of additives in products ranging from caffeinated energy drinks to industrial chemicals in food containers and water bottles, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration is under pressure to reexamine its rules, and there are signs it may do so."&lt;/p&gt;</description><a10:updated>2013-05-07T16:13:10-04:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">85899460961</guid><link>http://www.pewhealth.org/news-room/media-coverage/brominated-vegetable-oil-in-gatorade-85899460961</link><title>''Brominated Vegetable Oil in Gatorade?''</title><description>&lt;p&gt;From oil in Gatorade to the amount of caffeine and other stimulants in energy drinks and the so-called "pink slime" found in beef, previously unnoticed ingredients are coming under scrutiny as health-conscious consumers demand more information about what they eat and drink, and sometimes go public via social networking and the Internet.&lt;/p&gt;</description><a10:updated>2013-03-19T12:29:31-04:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">85899436532</guid><link>http://www.pewhealth.org/news-room/media-coverage/drink-ingredient-gets-a-look-85899436532</link><title>''Drink Ingredient Gets a Look''</title><description>&lt;p&gt;Sarah Kavanagh and her little brother were looking forward to the bottles of Gatorade they had put in the refrigerator after playing outdoors one hot, humid afternoon last month in Hattiesburg, Miss. But before she took a sip, Sarah, a dedicated vegetarian, did what she often does and checked the label to make sure no animal products were in the drink. One ingredient, brominated vegetable oil, caught her eye.&lt;/p&gt;</description><a10:updated>2012-12-13T12:03:55-05:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">85899426398</guid><link>http://www.pewhealth.org/news-room/media-coverage/toxicology-the-learning-curve-85899426398</link><title>Toxicology: The learning curve</title><description>Researchers say that some chemicals have unexpected and potent effects at very low doses — but regulators aren't convinced.</description><a10:updated>2012-10-29T17:15:00-04:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">85899413852</guid><link>http://www.pewhealth.org/news-room/media-coverage/who-determines-safety-of-new-food-ingredients-85899413852</link><title>''Who Determines Safety of New Food Ingredients?''</title><description>&lt;p&gt;"Grocery shoppers examining colorful packages bearing long lists of hard-to-pronounce ingredients might take comfort in the belief that those substances were deemed safe by the government. But that's not the case. Over the past 15 years, the vast majority of new ingredients added to U.S. food never received a safety determination from the government."&lt;/p&gt;</description><a10:updated>2012-08-27T10:34:06-04:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">85899409475</guid><link>http://www.pewhealth.org/reports-analysis/issue-briefs/pew-comments-on-draft-guidance-for-industry-regarding-nanotechnology-in-food-85899409475</link><title>Pew Comments on Draft Guidance for Industry Regarding Nanotechnology in Food</title><description>The Food Additives Project of the Pew Health Group strongly agrees with the FDA's draft decision to deny "generally recognized as safe" (GRAS) status to nanoengineered chemicals and review them as food additives. However, they list their concerns with certain aspects of the document and question the agency's claim that it has not reviewed GRAS notifications sanctioning the use of nanoengineered chemicals.</description><a10:updated>2012-08-03T18:02:13-04:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">85899408036</guid><link>http://www.pewhealth.org/news-room/media-coverage/self-affirmed-gras-under-fire-again-as-pew-highlights-loophole-that-appears-to-have-swallowed-the-law-85899408036</link><title>''Self-Affirmed GRAS Under Fire Again As Pew Highlights 'Loophole That Appears to Have Swallowed the Law''</title><description>&lt;p&gt;"There are serious weaknesses in a system that allows firms to self-affirm the safety of food ingredients without the approval or knowledge of regulators, according to researchers conducting a probe into the nation’s food additives law."&lt;/p&gt;</description><a10:updated>2012-07-27T15:12:55-04:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">85899367438</guid><link>http://www.pewhealth.org/reports-analysis/issue-briefs/review-of-the-scientific-basis-for-safety-decisions-on-hazards-of-substances-added-to-food-85899367438</link><title>Review of the Scientific Basis for Safety Decisions on Hazards of Substances Added to Food</title><description>&lt;p&gt;In April 2011 Pew Health Group convened a workshop bringing together more than 80 experts from government, industry, academia and public interest organizations to examine the principles underlying the development and use of scientific evidence to identify and characterize chemical hazards. Based on the workshop discussions, Pew made several important observations.&lt;/p&gt;</description><a10:updated>2012-07-27T10:00:00-04:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">85899380315</guid><link>http://www.pewhealth.org/news-room/video-library/expert-profile-maricel-maffini-85899380315</link><title>Expert Profile: Maricel Maffini</title><description>&lt;p&gt;Maricel Maffini, Senior Officer, Food Additives Project&lt;/p&gt;</description><a10:updated>2012-04-04T09:53:59-04:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">85899371503</guid><link>http://www.pewhealth.org/news-room/video-library/expert-profile-tom-neltner-85899371503</link><title>Expert Profile: Tom Neltner</title><description>&lt;p&gt;Tom Neltner, Project Director, Food Additives Project&lt;/p&gt;</description><a10:updated>2012-02-17T17:12:59-05:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">85899367321</guid><link>http://www.pewhealth.org/Experts/Detail/85899367321?title=tom-neltner</link><title>Tom Neltner</title><description>&lt;p&gt;Tom Neltner is the project director for the Food Additives Project, which examines current U.S. federal regulations regarding chemicals added to our food.&lt;/p&gt;</description><a10:updated>2011-12-09T16:05:00-05:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">85899367306</guid><link>http://www.pewhealth.org/Experts/Detail/85899367306?title=erik-olson</link><title>Erik Olson</title><description>&lt;p&gt;Erik Olson is director of food programs, overseeing work aimed at food safety, the quality of school food, and the food additives policy.&lt;/p&gt;</description><a10:updated>2011-12-09T16:00:00-05:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">85899367313</guid><link>http://www.pewhealth.org/Experts/Detail/85899367313?title=maricel-maffini</link><title>Maricel Maffini</title><description>&lt;p&gt;Maricel V. Maffini is a senior officer for the Food Additives Project, which studies the possible risks posed by chemicals included in food production.&lt;/p&gt;</description><a10:updated>2011-12-09T16:00:00-05:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">85899367991</guid><link>http://www.pewhealth.org/reports-analysis/reports/navigating-the-us-food-additive-regulatory-program-85899367991</link><title>Navigating the U.S. Food Additive Regulatory Program</title><description>&lt;p&gt;The Food Additives Amendment of 1958 is the foundation for the U.S. food additive regulatory program, which oversees most substances added to food. This article is a comprehensive review of the program, and includes original analysis of pre- and postmarket safety standards for various categories and subcategories of substances and their uses.&lt;/p&gt;</description><a10:updated>2011-10-26T17:15:00-04:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">85899370625</guid><link>http://www.pewhealth.org/reports-analysis/reports/enhancing-fdas-evaluation-of-science-to-ensure-chemicals-added-to-human-food-are-safe-proceedings-85899370625</link><title>Enhancing FDA's Evaluation of Science to Ensure Chemicals Added to Human Food are Safe (Proceedings)</title><description>&lt;p&gt;The Pew Charitable Trusts, the Institute of Food Technologists, and the journal Nature brought together over 80 experts in science and food policy to examine the principles underlying the development and use of scientific evidence needed to evaluate possible hazards posed by chemicals added to food. &lt;/p&gt;</description><a10:updated>2011-10-26T16:55:00-04:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">85899367902</guid><link>http://www.pewhealth.org/news-room/media-coverage/report-industry-decides-food-ingredient-safety-85899367902</link><title>''Report: Industry decides food ingredient safety''</title><description>&lt;p&gt;Thousands of ingredients that go into food have been classified as safe by private industry alone, without any government oversight, according to a new report published Wednesday...The peer-reviewed report published in the Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety journal draws on research funded by the Pew Health Group, the health and consumer safety arm of the nonprofit Pew Charitable Trusts.&lt;/p&gt;</description><a10:updated>2011-10-26T11:10:00-04:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">85899367472</guid><link>http://www.pewhealth.org/news-room/press-releases/food-chemical-regulations-rely-heavily-on-industry-self-policing-and-lack-transparency-85899367472</link><title>Food Chemical Regulations Rely Heavily on Industry Self-Policing and Lack Transparency</title><description>&lt;p&gt;Safety decisions concerning one-third of the more than 10,000 substances that may be added to human food were made by food manufacturers and a trade association without review by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), according to an analysis spearheaded by the Pew Health Group.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><a10:updated>2011-10-26T10:10:00-04:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">85899367980</guid><link>http://www.pewhealth.org/reports-analysis/reports/enhancing-fdas-evaluation-of-science-to-ensure-chemicals-added-to-human-food-are-safe-pre-workshop-materials-85899367980</link><title>Enhancing FDA’s Evaluation of Science to Ensure Chemicals Added to Human Food Are Safe (Pre-Workshop Materials)</title><description>&lt;p&gt;The workshop, co sponsored by Nature journal, the Institute of Food Technologists (IFT), and the Pew Heath Group, brought together more than 80 scientists and and policymakers to develop a shared understanding of the current system FDA uses to assess the hazards of chemicals added to human food and explore opportunities to strengthen that system.&lt;/p&gt;</description><a10:updated>2011-04-05T16:25:00-04:00</a10:updated></item></channel></rss>